creation science creation science
 

Print-Friendly PDF Version          Home Up

Articles Home
Rebuttal Home
Commentaries
Young Earth Index
Dinosaurs
Noah's Flood
Noah's Ark
Grand Canyon
Geology
Truth In Geology
Fossils
Ice Ages
Radiometric Dating
Dr. Henke Essays
Testimonies
Death Before Sin
Hebrew Word: Yom
Theistic Evolution
Theology
Astronomy
Anthropology
For Homeschoolers
YEC Book Reviews
Old Earth Books
Discipleship
Site Map

 

Site Navigation

Text Menu

Answers In Creation Home

------------

Articles Home

----------------

Creation Science Rebuttals by Ministry

------------

Original Creation Science Articles

------------

Creation Science Rebuttal Articles

------------

Dr. Henke's Young Earth Creation Science Rebuttals

------------

Young Earth Creation Science Argument Index

------------

Anthropology and Creation Science

------------

Astronomy and Creation Science

------------

Dinosaurs and Creation Science

------------

Creation Science Issues - Death Before Sin

------------

Fossils and Creation Science

------------

Geology and Creation Science

------------

Grand Canyon and Creation Science

------------

Creation Science Issues - Hebrew Word: Yom

------------

Ice Ages and Creation Science

------------

Noah's Ark and Creation Science

------------

Noah's Flood and Creation Science

------------

Radiometric Dating and Creation Science

------------

R.A.T.E. Project Rebuttals

------------

Theology and Creation Science

------------

Discipleship

------------

Scripture Memory

------------

For Homeschoolers

------------

Testimonies

------------

Young Earth Creation Science Book Reviews

------------

Old Earth Creation Science Books

------------

Theistic Evolution

------------

Web Links

------------

Site Map

 

Young Earth Creation Science -

Deceptive Attack on the Big Bang    

by Greg Neyman

© 2006, Old Earth Ministries

First Published 20 Aug 2005

Answers In Creation website

 

     The September 2005 issue of Creation magazine, a publication of the creation science ministry Answers in Genesis, contains an article on the Big Bang.  A summary of the article is posted on their website, at answersingenesis.org/creation/v26/i4/focus.asp. 

     The article discusses the issue of the size of the universe.  Basically, since the universe is 13.7 billion years old, and assuming the material from the Big Bang traveled at the speed of light, then the universe should only be 27.4 billion light years across.  They quote "new data" which says the universe is at least 156 billion light-years wide.  If you look at the source article which they give (click here to see source article), it dates from May 2004...hardly "new."

     The claim is then made that 33 leading scientists published an open letter to the scientific community, rejecting the Big Bang.  I was able to find a copy of this letter online, also dated from May 2004.  You can read it here.  It was originally published in New Scientist on 22 May 2004...six days before the article on the width of the universe.  Although the open letter refers to the inflation theory, the two articles, the one discussing the width of the universe, and the "open letter," are unrelated.  However, the reader of the Answers in Genesis article would think otherwise.  They use two totally unrelated articles, and piece them together for a story.

     The Answers in Genesis web article also fails to mention another key point.  The 33 scientists are not proposing that the earth is young...they accept that the universe is billions of years old.  They are proposing alternate theories to the Big Bang, namely Plasma cosmology and the steady-state model.  As the open letter states, both hypothesize an evolving universe without beginning or end.  In essence, their theories eliminate the "beginning" which the Big Bang proposes, hence you eliminate God.  With no beginning, you don't need a "beginner."   The real issue for the scientists is funding dollars for research, which usually goes to Big Bang research.

     Big Bang believers have nothing to worry about.  The theory is as strong as it ever was, and it continues to be confirmed by observational data.  Young earth creation science would dispute this, of course, but their arguments are superficial.

     To understand the article on the width of the universe, check out the same report on Space.com.  It has an addendum from the researcher, further explaining the article.

       If you are not a Christian, and you have been holding out on making a decision for Christ because the Church always preached a message that was contrary to what you saw in the scientific world, then rest assured that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and you can believe in Christ and receive salvation, while still believing in an old earth.  Click here for more.

 

    Are you a Christian who believes in young earth creationism?  Now that we have shown the many difficulties of the young earth creation science model in this and many other articles, how does this impact your Christian life?  If you are a young earth creationism believer, click here.